Happy New Year

Randy| January 12, 2009 10:09 am

Happy New Year.Happy New Year 2009! I hope it is healty, happy and prosperous for everyone. 

2008 was a pretty good year; did some traveling (got lost in the Gobi Desert), took some pictures, sold some pictures, got a new camera (or two) and nearly fulfilled my 2008 New Year’s Resolution.  What was my resolution you ask?  Well, for 2008 it was to take 6 (six) images that were good enough (both in composition and image quality) to print (at 17×22), frame and sell in a limited of editions of 10 each.  So out of the thousands of images taken in 2008 I got (drumroll please)… 4 (four)! Which was pretty good if you ask me. Sure I had quite a few images that were pretty good (some I felt damn good); but in the end only 4 made the cut. 

Selling my work was quite an experience.  I don’t quite know how to describe it; I sell commercial work all the time, but selling something as “art” was somehow different.  I took it personally (which I never do with commercial stuff), I was actually concerned with people’s opinion.  Well let me rephrase that, I’m always concerned with the client’s opinion (after all they are paying for it so I’d better care), but I don’t take it personally when they don’t like it or want me to make a change; it’s just part of the business.  But this was different I cared what people thought, I mean really cared.  I remember walking into a framer with one of the buyers (he opted to buy an unframed print; and pick his own frame); there were 20 people in store not including the staff and every one of them had something to say about the image (some good, some bad) needless to say I was very uncomfortable.  And things only got worse when the framer asked me to sign the matte (the signature on the image was covered by his choice of matte) and a few of the customers realized I was the photographer.  That made for a few awkward moments but in the end resulted in another sale, so I guess it was a good thing.

I haven’t decided on a goal for 2009 yet but I’ll post it here when I do.

Harder than it looks

Randy| December 6, 2008 4:28 pm

WOW! I’ve really been slacking off; I missed at least two months.  In brief I: moved (just down the block from my old place), finished a huge work project (about 50 shooting days) and today remembered I was supposed to shooting and sharing something everyday.  So let’s get sharing…

D3 AFS 200-400VR @200mm 1/1250 f/7.1

D3 AFS 200-400VR @200mm 1/1250 f/7.1

It has been a while since I’ve been really challenged in photography; I’m not saying I know all there is to know, it’s just that most of my work is commercial, controlled and “safe”. I know my lighting setups, the subjects aren’t moving or if they are it is in a very linear and predictable path. So when my friend Mark called and asked me to go ”birding” this morning I was excited and ready for something new and challenging. Apparently you have to get up EARLY for birding because for some reason I was in the car and headed down the freeway before sunrise (I know I know the “golden light” of pre-dawn; but you know what it’s pretty golden at 5PM too).  Now I know shooting action isn’t easy but I figured I would be pretty good at this bird stuff. I’ve covered my share of sporting events (Soccer, Basketball, Football etc.) and I know the ins and outs of my AF system but this was probably the hardest thing I’ve ever done.  Birds are small, FAST and hard to track, did I mention FAST?

D3 AFS 200-400VR @200mm 1/800 f/5.6

D3 AFS 200-400VR @200mm 1/800 f/5.6

 

Honestly, I took roughly 300 shots of these pelicans circling and diving and flopping around in the water before I got a handle on how to anticipate their dives.  Then came figuring out how to track them… hmm single focus? What about AF-C Dynamic (51-3D or maybe 21), wait but what about the Lock-On value? Or should I just hit the “idiot box” (no offense if you use “Auto-Area”)? So after about an hour of fumbling with the different settings I finally figured it out and was able to get a keepers.

 

D3 AFS 200-400VR @200mm 1/800 f/5.6
D3 AFS 200-400VR @200mm 1/800 f/5.6

Aside from setting the camera correctly, the most important thing I learned is that you need the right equipment for this kind of shooting; probably more so than most other types.  For most action sports I stick a big lens on a monopod and its pretty much all good.  But with the birds you definitely need a gimbal head, Mark had a Wimberly Sidekick mounted to an RRS BH-55 on a solid tripod and when he let me try it out I realized I was struggling with things that the right equipment would have eliminated.  (BTW- I was also using a BH-55 on similar legs; the Wimberly made all difference.)  But even with the right gear this type of photography is much harder than it looks and I can’t wait to get back out there and try it again.

A Realization and Renewed Focus

Randy| September 21, 2008 11:54 am

In the last week I’ve realized something… making frame worth sharing (or even something interesting) everyday is hard work, much harder than I thought.  I do have frames from everyday this past week but most of them are, what’s the word? Oh ya, “Crap” as in a waste of pixels.  Sure I learned something in the process and perhaps that alone made the weeks’ photos worthwhile, but the whole process has been very discouraging. Looking for a bit of encouragement I emailed a better shooter and asked for his advice, his response was brief: “Did you read [Joe] McNally’s post on Sept 10?”. So off to McNally’s site I went and read the Sept 10 post, and it was like he was speaking directly to me (you can read it here) and I’ll save you the trouble of figuring out what part spoke to me:

…Cause this is hard to do, right? Day after day, you come back without a great or even good frame. I’m reminded of the conversation betweeen Tom Hanks and Geena Davis in League of Their Own.

Jimmy Dugam: “Baseball is what gets inside you, it’s what lights you up. You can’t deny that.”
Dottie: “It just got too hard.”
Jimmy: “It’s supposed to be hard. If it wasn’t hard, everyone would do it. It’s the hard that makes it great.”

There’s a lot of analogies between photography and baseball. Ray Fitzgerald of the Boston Globe wrote, “A critic once characterized baseball as six minutes of action crammed into two-and-one-half hours.”

Sounds like a photo shoot to me.

So I’m picking up my camera and getting back to work, not because it’s easy (well sometimes it is) but because it’s hard and like Jimmy said “it’s the hard that makes it great”.